Call
for an Asian Economic Community
The
Delhi Consensus
The
Asian Economic Community is an idea whose time has come. Voices
for more intensive economic cooperation among Asian countries are
emanating from different places. It is also evident from the importance
that is being attached by different Asian countries to regional
economic integration at the bilateral or sub-regional levels. Formation
of a broader pan-Asian economic community could enable the region
to resume its rapid growth despite the uncertain global economic
outlook and emerge as the centre of gravity in the world economy.
It could also do away with the need for concluding multiple pairs
of bilateral or sub-regional agreements. Regional trade liberalization
accompanied by freer movements of investment, technology and skills
among the Asian countries would generate substantial efficiency
gains by enabling the participating countries to exploit their complementarities
to mutual advantage. Furthermore, regional Keynesianism based on
cooperation in finance and monetary policy including the Asian bonds
has the potential to help the region recover hundreds of billions
of dollars of potential output lost due to underutilization of capacity
and pull the major economies such as Japan out of prolonged recession
besides helping the region in achieving the exchange rate stability.
However, an important precondition for the integration to be successful
would be a common minimum agenda of reforms undertaken in different
economies. Asian countries could also benefit from exchange of experiences
with respect to reforms, financial restructuring and corporate governance
and strengthen their leverage in international negotiations by greater
coordination. In particular, agriculture is an area for a major
interest for most of the countries in the region.
An
ambitious programme of Asian economic integration has to be implemented
in a gradual or evolutionary manner. First of all, there could be
a phasing of the participation of countries, taking cue from the
experience of successful groupings of the world. A beginning could
be made with a core group combining the major economies that have
already made some attempts at regional economic integration such
as ASEAN+3 and ASEAN+1. This core group of major economies, viz.
Japan, ASEAN, China, India and Korea (JACIK) alone accounts for
half of the world’s population, a GDP larger than EU’s, exports
larger than NAFTA’s and foreign reserves larger than those of EU’s
and NAFTA combined. Once the programmes of economic integration
have consolidated and have produced some results, other interested
countries in Asia could be admitted. Similarly, a phasing of the
areas of cooperation could be advisable with cooperation in finance
and money taking the lead and trade and investment liberalization
following it closely. The sectoral areas of cooperation need to
be identified. Some sectors that have a great deal of potential
include joint R&D and technology generation in new and high
technologies, shipping and maritime cooperation, tourism, among
many other sectors. Technology including ICT is a strength of Asian
countries which could be a key to successful cooperation. Given
the expanding demand of oil and gas in the region, a consideration
of cooperation in energy sector was also of paramount importance.
A
study of Asian history shows that in the pre-colonial period, a
virtual Asian economic community existed as evident by vibrant intra-regional
exchanges of goods, cultures and values. One should not underestimate
the political, social and institutional challenges to getting an
ambitious programme such as this off-the-ground. Political or strategic
implications of an Asian Economic Community also need to be studied.
The economic logic of cooperation could overcome the challenges
posed by reservations, if any, on political or strategic grounds.
The
think-tank community of Asia has a critical role to play in realizing
the dream of building a New Asia by showing the way forward to the
policy makers with specific proposals for implementation. We agree
to keep the informal network of think-tanks created at this Conference
alive and active as a springboard for generating new ideas. This
Network (or New Asia Network) should conduct research on different
aspects of Asian economic integration to follow-up and further refine
the ideas generated at this Conference. It should regularly exchange
ideas among the participants and others interested in the subject
and launch a Newsletter to serve as a forum of exchange of views
and research. Having taken the initiative to organize the Conference
and assemble these think-tanks under one roof, RIS could serve as
a nodal point of the New Asia Network and coordinate its work until
alternative arrangements are made.
We
strongly urge the Governments of the region to consider the recommendations
made by the New Asia Network. We could meet again in fall
2004 at a location in Japan and again in New Delhi in 2005 and make
presentations based on our work till then. At these Conferences,
participation of representatives of the JACIK Governments would
help in taking the ideas generated by the Network to their logical
conclusion.
|